Alibaba

Qwen3 235b A22b Instruct 2507 ReasoningOpen

Qwen3 235b A22b Instruct 2507 Reasoning by Unknown.

#548released Jan 1, 2025·Open Weights·Not disclosed
text131K ctxreasoning
API providersGet API Key →Leaderboard
Intelligence
19.9 #548
Top 74% tier
Output Speed
55 t/s
ITL 18.2 ms/tok
Blended price (3:1)
$0.875 /1M
In $0.5/M · Out $2/M
Context
131K
≈ 328 A4 pages · max out 16,384

Quality Domain Radar

6-Axis Frontier Evaluation vs Category Average & Flagship

Qwen3 235b A22b Instruct 2507 Reasoning
Claude Mythos Preview (#1)
Average (68)
Coding (40)Mathematics (24.9)Hard Science (GPQA) (55)Agentic & Tool Use (20)Knowledge (MMLU) (45)Vision / Multimodal (30)

Radar axes are approximated from category scores where direct benchmark measurements are missing — see Methodology.

API deployment

Compare hosts & latency

Throughput, TTFT and cache pricing across Groq, Cerebras, Together, DeepInfra, Fireworks, Bedrock and Azure.

GroqCerebrasTogether AIDeepInfraFireworks AIAWS BedrockAzure AI
View providers matrix →

Scores by Source

Model Details

Release date
Jan 1, 2025
Parameters
Not disclosed
License
Open Weights
Context Window
131,000 tokens
Input Price
$0.5/M
Output Price
$2/M
Output Speed
55 t/s
Time to First Token
—

Estimated monthly bill

Estimated monthly spend
$0.00
Calculating savings vs GPT-4o...

Cite & embed

GitHub Markdown badge
Loading badge markdown...
BibTeX
@misc{llmpodium2026qwen3235ba22binstruct2507reasoning,
  title = {Benchmark Analysis and Intelligence Evaluation of Qwen3 235b A22b Instruct 2507 Reasoning},
  author = {LLMPodium Research},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://llmpodium.com/models/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning}
}

Embed Score Badge

Add a live Podium Score badge to your GitHub or Hugging Face README — it links back to the live ranking.

Preview
Qwen3 235b A22b Instruct 2507 Reasoning LLMPodium Score
Markdown
Loading badge snippet...
HTML
Loading badge snippet...

More from Alibaba

Alternative Models

Closest alternatives to Qwen3 235b A22b Instruct 2507 Reasoning based on capabilities, pricing, and benchmark scores.

0 / 4