Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Frontier coding and agentic model by Anthropic with state-of-the-art SWE-Bench Verified performance.

#3출시일: 2026년 8월 15일·Proprietary·Not disclosed
textimage500K ctxreasoning
API providersvs Claude Mythos Preview순위표
Intelligence
88.4 #3
Top 1% tier
Output speed
85 t/s
TTFT 350 ms · ITL 11.8 ms/tok
Blended price (3:1)
$6 /1M
In $3/M · Out $15/M
Context
500K
≈ 1,250 A4 pages · max out 32768

Quality Domain Radar

6-Axis Frontier Evaluation vs Category Average & Flagship

Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Mythos Preview (#1)
Average (68)
Coding (95.5)Mathematics (93.4)Hard Science (GPQA) (92)Agentic & Tool Use (86.4)Knowledge (MMLU) (58)Vision / Multimodal (62)

Radar axes are approximated from category scores where direct benchmark measurements are missing — see 평가 방법.

API deployment

Compare hosts & latency

Throughput, TTFT and cache pricing across Groq, Cerebras, Together, DeepInfra, Fireworks, Bedrock and Azure.

GroqCerebrasTogether AIDeepInfraFireworks AIAWS BedrockAzure AI
View providers matrix →

출처별 점수

모델 상세 정보

출시일
2026년 8월 15일
파라미터 수
Not disclosed
라이선스
Proprietary
컨텍스트 창
500,000 tokens
입력 가격
$3/M
출력 가격
$15/M
출력 속도
85 t/s
첫 토큰 생성 시간
350 ms

Estimated monthly bill

Estimated monthly spend
$0.00
Calculating savings vs GPT-4o...

Cite & embed

GitHub Markdown badge
[![LLMPodium Rank](https://llmpodium.com/badge/claude-fable-5-1/rank.svg)](https://llmpodium.com/models/claude-fable-5-1)
BibTeX
@misc{llmpodium2026claudefable51,
  title = {Benchmark Analysis and Intelligence Evaluation of Claude Fable 5.1},
  author = {LLMPodium Research},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://llmpodium.com/models/claude-fable-5-1}
}

정면 비교

More from Anthropic

대체 모델

성능, 가격 및 벤치마크 점수를 기반으로 한 Claude Fable 5.1의 주요 대체 모델.

0 / 4