Migliore IA per la revisione del codice
Le classifiche combinano più punteggi benchmark ponderati in base alla rilevanza per questo caso d'uso. Aggiornato agosto 2026.
Risposta rapida
1. Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic, Punteggio: 94.0), 2. Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) (Anthropic, Punteggio: 85.8), 3. Claude Fable 5.1 (High) (Anthropic, Punteggio: 85.8).
| # | Modello | Provider | Punteggio | Velocità | Prezzo (output) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 94.0 | 85 t/s | $15/M |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 78 t/s | $15/M |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 (High) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 92 t/s | $15/M |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 104 t/s | $15/M |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 118 t/s | $15/M |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | 84.8 | 71 t/s | $50/M |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | 84.6 | 68 t/s | $25/M |
| 8 | GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | 78.1 | 82 t/s | $50/M |
| 9 | Kimi K3 | Moonshot AI | 76.0 | 37 t/s | $15/M |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 (XHigh) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 62 t/s | $25/M |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5.5 (High) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 74 t/s | $25/M |
| 12 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 82 t/s | $25/M |
| 13 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 92 t/s | $25/M |
| 14 | Claude Mythos Preview | Anthropic | 75.0 | 80 t/s | $15/M |
| 15 | GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) | OpenAI | 71.7 | 76 t/s | $50/M |
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Kimi K3