Migliori modelli AI per ragionamento
Classifica dei modelli per capacità di ragionamento. Aggiornato agosto 2026.
| # | Modello | Provider | Punteggio | Velocità | Prezzo (output) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Mythos Preview | Anthropic | 98.8 | 80 t/s | $15/M |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | 96.0 | 82 t/s | $50/M |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 92.0 | 85 t/s | $15/M |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) | OpenAI | 90.0 | 76 t/s | $50/M |
| 5 | GPT-6 Astra (high) | OpenAI | 90.0 | 90 t/s | $50/M |
| 6 | GPT-6 Astra (medium) | OpenAI | 90.0 | 98 t/s | $50/M |
| 7 | GPT-6 Astra (low) | OpenAI | 90.0 | 110 t/s | $50/M |
| 8 | GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | 88.0 | 120 t/s | $20/M |
| 9 | GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | 87.6 | 72 t/s | $30/M |
| 10 | Kimi K3 | Moonshot AI | 86.5 | 37 t/s | $15/M |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | 86.0 | 68 t/s | $25/M |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) | Anthropic | 85.0 | 78 t/s | $15/M |
| 13 | Claude Fable 5.1 (High) | Anthropic | 85.0 | 92 t/s | $15/M |
| 14 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium) | Anthropic | 85.0 | 104 t/s | $15/M |
| 15 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low) | Anthropic | 85.0 | 118 t/s | $15/M |
| 16 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | 82.8 | 50 t/s | $15/M |
| 17 | Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | 82.3 | 60 t/s | $25/M |
| 18 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | 81.0 | 71 t/s | $50/M |
| 19 | GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | 80.4 | 60 t/s | $10/M |
| 20 | GPT-6 Luna (xhigh) | OpenAI | 80.0 | 118 t/s | $20/M |
Claude Mythos Preview
GPT-6 Astra
Kimi K3Top 5 \u2014 Confronto rapido
Metodologia
Le classifiche si basano su valutazioni benchmark indipendenti.