Mejor IA para análisis de documentos
Las clasificaciones combinan varias puntuaciones de benchmarks ponderadas según su relevancia para cada caso de uso. Actualizado agosto 2026.
Respuesta rápida
1. Qwen3.7 Max (Alibaba, Puntuación: 82.6), 2. GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) (OpenAI, Puntuación: 81.5), 3. GPT-6 Astra (high) (OpenAI, Puntuación: 81.5).
| # | Modelo | Proveedor | Puntuación | Velocidad | Precio (salida) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Alibaba | 82.6 | 203 t/s | $7.5/M |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) | OpenAI | 81.5 | 76 t/s | $50/M |
| 3 | GPT-6 Astra (high) | OpenAI | 81.5 | 90 t/s | $50/M |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra (medium) | OpenAI | 81.5 | 98 t/s | $50/M |
| 5 | GPT-6 Astra (low) | OpenAI | 81.5 | 110 t/s | $50/M |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | 78.8 | 71 t/s | $50/M |
| 7 | GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | 78.7 | 82 t/s | $50/M |
| 8 | Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | 77.2 | 60 t/s | $25/M |
| 9 | Claude Mythos 5 | Anthropic | 76.7 | 50 t/s | $50/M |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | 75.7 | 68 t/s | $25/M |
| 11 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next | Alibaba | 75.4 | 168 t/s | $0.4/M |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 74.8 | 85 t/s | $15/M |
| 13 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | 74.8 | 50 t/s | $15/M |
| 14 | GLM-5.3 Flash | Z.ai | 74.7 | 182 t/s | $0.3/M |
| 15 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | DeepSeek | 74.4 | 214 t/s | $1.2/M |
Qwen3.7 Max
GPT-6 Astra (xhigh)
Claude Fable 5
GLM-5.3 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash