Mejor IA para revisión de código
Las clasificaciones combinan varias puntuaciones de benchmarks ponderadas según su relevancia para cada caso de uso. Actualizado agosto 2026.
Respuesta rápida
1. Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic, Puntuación: 94.0), 2. Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) (Anthropic, Puntuación: 85.8), 3. Claude Fable 5.1 (High) (Anthropic, Puntuación: 85.8).
| # | Modelo | Proveedor | Puntuación | Velocidad | Precio (salida) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 94.0 | 85 t/s | $15/M |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 78 t/s | $15/M |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 (High) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 92 t/s | $15/M |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 104 t/s | $15/M |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low) | Anthropic | 85.8 | 118 t/s | $15/M |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | 84.8 | 71 t/s | $50/M |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | 84.6 | 68 t/s | $25/M |
| 8 | GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | 78.1 | 82 t/s | $50/M |
| 9 | Kimi K3 | Moonshot AI | 76.0 | 37 t/s | $15/M |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 (XHigh) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 62 t/s | $25/M |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5.5 (High) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 74 t/s | $25/M |
| 12 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 82 t/s | $25/M |
| 13 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low) | Anthropic | 75.3 | 92 t/s | $25/M |
| 14 | Claude Mythos Preview | Anthropic | 75.0 | 80 t/s | $15/M |
| 15 | GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) | OpenAI | 71.7 | 76 t/s | $50/M |
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Kimi K3