coding Coding · llm-stats.com

LiveCodeBench

Continuously refreshed competitive programming problems immune to data contamination.

61
Modelos probados
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Modelo destacado
93.5%
Mejor puntuación
DeepSeek
Proveedor
#ModeloLiveCodeBenchProveedorPodium Score
1
93.5%
DeepSeek46.0
2
91.7%
Google51.9
3
91.6%
DeepSeek42.0
4
84%
Anthropic94.8
5
83.3%
DeepSeek12.9
6
82%
OpenAI92.4
7
81.5%
Google93.6
8
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
80%
Moonshot AI94.2
9
79.4%
xAI54.5
10
77%
Google90.8
11
77%
Xiaomi88.4
12
76.2%
OpenAI86.2
13
76%
Mistral89.8
14
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
74.7%
Moonshot AI83.3
15
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
74.3%
OpenAI54.0
16
74%
OpenAI66.4
17
74%
OpenAI52.4
18
74%
OpenAI49.1
19
MiniMax M3
MiniMax
74%
MiniMax39.6
20
73.7%
OpenAI80.8
21
73.3%
Xiaomi48.0
22
73%
NVIDIA87.8
23
72.7%
Google60.6
24
72%
Moonshot AI91.5
25
72%
Anthropic87.5
26
71.3%
Z.ai59.1
27
70%
Anthropic93.4
28
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
70%
Anthropic81.4
29
69.7%
Google65.9
30
69.7%
Meta47.0
31
69.7%
Alibaba32.4
32
69.5%
Alibaba66.8
33
69.3%
Google50.0
34
69%
Alibaba51.0
35
GLM-4.5 Air
Zhipu AI
68%
Zhipu AI88.9
36
68%
DeepSeek54.5
37
67.7%
Anthropic76.0
38
67.7%
xAI61.3
39
67%
NVIDIA19.0
40
66.7%
Tencent38.9
41
66.5%
Z.ai64.2
42
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
66.3%
Moonshot AI41.8
43
65%
Google85.4
44
63.3%
Meta69.9
45
Inkling
Thinking Machines
63.3%
Thinking Machines31.7
46
62%
Ling88.5
47
58.7%
Anthropic45.4
48
58.3%
Anthropic61.2
49
58%
IBM58.6
50
57%
Z.ai46.0
51
57%
Anthropic0.0
52
55%
MiniMax45.0
53
45%
IBM49.2
54
43%
Mistral35.0
55
41%
Anthropic24.1
56
39%
Amazon14.4
57
37%
OpenAI30.0
58
36%
IBM42.0
59
28%
Upstage23.0
60
27%
OpenAI22.0
61
27%
K222.0
Datos agregados de llm-stats.com. Ver Metodología.
0 / 4