coding Coding · llm-stats.com

SWE-Bench Verified

Real GitHub issues resolved end-to-end; the industry standard for agentic coding.

51
Getestete Modelle
Claude Fable 5
Top-Modell
95%
Top-Score
Anthropic
Anbieter
#ModellSWE-Bench VerifiedAnbieterPodium Score
1
95%
Anthropic93.4
2
93.9%
Anthropic97.4
3
91.5%
Anthropic94.8
4
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
91.5%
Moonshot AI94.2
5
90.2%
OpenAI86.2
6
89%
OpenAI92.4
7
88.6%
Anthropic76.0
8
88%
Google93.6
9
87.6%
Anthropic52.0
10
86%
Xiaomi88.4
11
85.5%
Google90.8
12
85.2%
Anthropic45.4
13
84.5%
Mistral89.8
14
84%
Anthropic87.5
15
83%
NVIDIA87.8
16
80.9%
Anthropic52.1
17
80.8%
Anthropic61.2
18
80.6%
Google60.6
19
80.6%
DeepSeek46.0
20
MiniMax M3
MiniMax
80.5%
MiniMax39.6
21
80.4%
Alibaba51.0
22
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
80.2%
Moonshot AI49.0
23
GPT-5.2
OpenAI
80%
OpenAI49.2
24
79.6%
Anthropic38.1
25
79%
DeepSeek42.0
26
78.9%
Xiaomi48.0
27
78.8%
Alibaba32.4
28
78%
Google42.4
29
78%
Tencent38.9
30
77.7%
Alibaba42.2
31
77.4%
Meta47.0
32
Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
76.5%
ByteDance40.0
33
76.4%
Alibaba23.9
34
GPT-5.1
OpenAI
76.3%
OpenAI42.3
35
76.2%
Google51.9
36
76%
Google85.4
37
GPT-5
OpenAI
74.9%
OpenAI23.0
38
74.5%
Anthropic21.7
39
73.1%
DeepSeek12.9
40
Simba 3.2
Independent
72%
Independent87.8
41
65%
DeepSeek54.5
42
47%
Anthropic0.0
43
46%
Z.ai46.0
44
45%
MiniMax45.0
45
35%
Mistral35.0
46
33%
Anthropic24.1
47
32%
Amazon14.4
48
30%
OpenAI30.0
49
23%
Upstage23.0
50
22%
OpenAI22.0
51
22%
K222.0
Benchmark-Daten aggregiert aus llm-stats.com. Siehe Methodik.
0 / 4